E-cigarettes are making tobacco obsolete. So why ban them? – Spectator.co.uk

E-cigarettes are making tobacco obsolete. So why ban them?

The left and the medical establishment ought to get behind this marvellous development
7 Comments Matt Ridley 3 May 2014

If somebody invented a pill that could cure a disease that kills five million people a year worldwide, 100,000 of them in this country, the medical powers that be would surely encourage it, pay for it, perhaps even make it compulsory. They certainly would not stand in its way.

A relentless stream of data from around the world is showing that e-cigarettes are robbing tobacco companies of today’s customers — and cancer wards of their future patients. In Britain alone two million now use these devices regularly. In study after study, scientists are finding e-cigarettes to be effective at helping people quit, to show no signs of luring non-smokers into tobacco use and to be much safer than their noxious competitors.

So what in heaven’s name explains the fact that Dame Sally Davies, the government’s chief medical officer, when asked by the New Scientist in March what was the biggest health challenge we face in Britain, named three things, one of which was the electronic cigarette? That’s like criticising contraception because you prefer abstinence.

The NHS is confident that these devices are about 1,000 times less harmful than cigarettes. The government confirmed this figure in a parliamentary answer to me. It’s the tar in smoke that kills, not the nicotine — a substance that is about as harmful as caffeine.

We know vaping (as it’s known) works better than any other method of giving up smoking. A forthcoming study by Professor Robert West of University College London finds that e-cigarettes proved 60 per cent more successful as a method of quitting than nicotine patches, gums or going cold turkey. By a country mile, free enterprise devices are outstripping the health results of medicinally regulated devices. And for many vested interests that is the problem.

We know that most people use e-cigarettes to cut down or give up smoking. This has been confirmed by three big surveys, the latest of which, conducted by Ash, the anti-smoking group, was published this week: two thirds of users in the survey were smokers and one third were ex-smokers. That means in the few years since the products first appeared, hundreds of thousands of people have used them to give up or cut down.

Inline sub2

We know that e-cigarettes are not proving to be a gateway into tobacco. In the biggest global survey, 0.4 per cent of vapers were non-smokers and not one of them went on to smoke. In the UK, 20 per cent of 15-year-olds are regular smokers: they are mostly the ones who try vaping, so even in the young the technology is a gateway out of smoking, not into it. (And it makes snogging taste better.) Yet what is the UK government’s main legislative response to e-cigarettes so far? To ban sales of e-cigarettes to children.

Do the maths. If e-cigarettes are 1,000 times less harmful than cigarettes, then for every youngster who goes from smoking to vaping, there would have be a thousand going the other way before there is net harm. If anything, the ratio is the other way round: in one American study, nine out of ten school-age vapers had started as smokers.

The firms that make e-cigarettes — which are mostly small start-up companies, the technology having come from China — are not allowed to claim they can save your life. Imagine what they could sell if they could. Instead their adverts try to hint that vaping is cool, which feeds the puritan suspicion that somebody somewhere might be enjoying themselves.

This argument that vaping is going to ‘renormalise’ smoking is the one the British Medical Association has been pushing, and, as Ash is now saying, it is clearly nonsense. With that gone, what arguments are left to justify regulating the advertising, public use and product strength of this life-saving technology to the point of discouraging it?

Some medics probably just hate the thought that a near-miraculous cure for a big cause of death came from the private sector and not from the nanny state. The people selling these things are doing so for — gasp! — profit, not because they want to save lives.

In several conversations I have had with senior medics, they immediately raised the horrifying fact that the tobacco industry has recently started producing e-cigarettes. For them this was a clinching argument against the technology.

No, I replied, that is the best news of all. The fact that even the tobacco industry is going to be competing against tobacco is great news. It shows that big tobacco can read the writing on the wall and is trying to get out of selling smoke before it goes the way of Kodak film. The number of people smoking is falling fast. Imperial Tobacco recorded a 16 per cent decline in UK sales last year. One US investment broker reckons vaping will be bigger than smoking by 2023. The tobacco industry is panicking.

It means you have won, I tell medics. Forget your bans on smoking in cars with children in, or banning brand names on packets. These were never going to make more than a marginal difference anyway. The cigarette is going the way of the top hat and the crinoline, if we encourage the safer, cleaner alternative. Here’s a life–saving technology on a massive scale that needs no funding. Are you sure that you — swearers of the Hippocratic oath — want to be the last people standing in its way, when everybody else can see the benefits?

The opposition to vaping has had an unfortunate result already. By insisting on including e-cigarettes in the EU’s tobacco products directive, the opponents have left them unregulated till the directive comes into force by 2017. And then over-regulated, pushing up prices and reducing choice after 2017. So unless the UK government makes its own helpful intervention, for the next two-and-a-half years there is little to stop rogue operators importing fake or adulterated vaping fluids from some crook. Plus the battle over regulation, as so often, helps the big guys and hurts the little guys.

By the way, where’s the left in all this? Smoking is increasingly concentrated in lower socioeconomic groups. How can we get e-cigarettes into the hands of the poor quickly? The high up-front costs of e-cigarettes (followed by lower ‘running’ costs) means their take-up by poorer people has been slower. Why are libertarians doing all the hard work?

Next time you hear somebody say that they worry about the potential risks of e-cigarettes, remind them of Voltaire’s dictum — don’t let the best be the enemy of the good.

This article first appeared in the print edition of The Spectator magazine, dated 3 May 2014

Tags: Cigarettes, Dame Sally Davies, E-cigarettes, Industry, medical establishment, New Scientist, NHS, Smoking, tobacco, vaping

There’s never been a better time to subscribe. A year’s subscription to the print magazine, plus full online and app access from just £1 a week. Join us now.


  • Lepard

    Not given any attention, perhaps the 2.2 million vapers are redirecting some of their new found wealth ( that would have been spent in cigarettes) back into the economy?
    Something which our chancellor is missing but taking the credit for judging by recent economic news?

    • Mark

      Is it not the case that the treasury do exceedingly well out of smoking due to the high rates of tax obtained from their sale.

  • http://www.saorsa.eu Black Hack

    It was once OK to have slaves, It was OK to have kids down the mines and up chimneys,but these things have gone into history, much like smoking, cigarettes will do in the future…The fact that I as a “Heavy” smoker have gone from having a fag in my hands almost constantly in my waking hours to No tobacco at all without any cravings or side effects can only make the case stronger…

  • philiphuw

    Is it because the health fascists cannot bear to see people deriving any sort of pleasure from anything? They really are both graceless and joyless.

  • Dragonmum

    One thing I am certain of is that when Health Professionals at the sharp end – GPs, nurses etc – are handed the facts backed up by hard copy of the many studies, they do a bit of a double-take then tell the patient to carry on using their e-cig, despite what the BMA may say. They see the patient’s history on computer and cannot fail to be impressed. Vaping is a fait accompli, there is no way of turning back, but if Government and the various Health Bodies and Charities really had the well-being of the nation at heart they would be actively promoting this long-awaited weapon against the scourge of smoking and would be encouraging advertising and freedom of use.

    I have used my devices for the past 4 plus years, and, whilst never having seen any health claims made, it seemed childishly obvious that if the tar is absent then so is the potential for disease; my years of steroids and antibiotics for the repeated chest infections and asthma caused by 60+ years of smoking disappeared on Jan 28th 2010. The day I got my first primitive e-cig is written on my heart!
    Now the EU has cobbled together a blue-print for a vaporiser that will be totally useless to heavy smokers – the very people who need them – but will fit in very nicely with the Big Tobacco cigalike plan; the higher strength, satisfying level of nicotine- containing devices will be available only through the big Pharmaceuticals so the Multinationals win again and the SMEs, who of course have David Cameron’s undying support, go out of business – has he any idea how many people cater to a market of 2.1 million? and most of them home-grown – China is now cloning many of our products.
    This has been a sickening process from the start, and the finishing-line isn’t even in sight, because all vapers intend to “vape hard and vape on” either this side of the law or ‘t’other. We say “No” to tiny ten mil bottles – an environmental disaster, and “No” to 20mg liquid as long as we have breath, and as long as tobacco is freely available for purchase – which is, of course, forever.
    Thank you for your usual insightful take on the situation – it’s what we always expect in your articles and we are never disappointed

  • Doggie Roussel

    It’s all about tax revenue from the greedy, self-serving parasites who govern us… the tax on a packet of cigarettes is about 95% of its retail worth…

    If all those armholes who are determined to drink and smoke themselves to death of a weekend disappear where is the government of the day going to get the revenue from the brain-dead masses ?

    Phoney-fags will have to be taxed to oblivion to make up the shortfall… it ain’t gonna happen…

    Any UK government is hugely dependent on the tax revenue from cigarettes and alcohol… two of the biggest self-inflicted killers on this planet… what does this tell you about the people who seek to govern us ?

  • Dick_Puddlecote

    “By the way, where’s the left in all this?”

    Without exception, they are desperate to put any obstacle in the way of e-cigs and actively campaigning for bans, restrictions, impossible-to-comply regulations and taxation. It is solely because of the left that e-cigs are to be effectively banned by the EU in 2017.

    Remember that when they cry crocodile tears over tobacco in the future.

Subscribe to the Spectator

Bog standard popup

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.

This entry was posted in Vaporizer E-Cigarette Stocks News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback.